Forbes Calls Out the CDC for Double Standards and Hypocrisy in Ecig Policies

CDC ecig hypocrisy 4

According to a recent report from the CDC, heroin use had doubled in the last ten years and the number of overdoses has quadrupled since 2002. The government has issued a massive response with multiple hearings in Congress, aggressive treatment regimes with opiate replacements, and needle exchange programs. This all sounds like a step in the right direction, but it also causes some confusion when you compare the response to heroin with the current response to electronic cigarettes.

The CDC is quick to approve methadone as a replacement for heroin to prevent death and disease, but smoking kills thousands more people each year than heroin ever has or will. So why is the CDC so fast to condemn and demonize electronic cigarettes? In a recent Forbes article, the CDC was questioned for their strange approach to ecigs in light of public health. “The CDC supports harm reduction for opiates… but warns smokers to stay away from e-cigarettes or smokeless tobacco. This flies in the face of the much-replicated data we have about the safety of these products relative to cigarettes.”

Common sense shows that vaping is a smart alternative to help smokers step away from tobacco use. Ecigs are battery operated so there is no smoke, no carcinogenic tars or gases, and no combustion. Forbes said, “The risks of cancer, lung disease, and heart disease are vastly diminished compared to smoking.”

The main ingredients in ecigs are nicotine, flavorings, and propylene glycol, a substance approved by the FDA for use in asthma inhalers, toothpaste, cosmetics, and many foods. For all intents and purposes, ecigs are no more dangerous than nicotine gums and many actually contain far less nicotine.

Yet the CDC points to ecigs as a gateway to smoking for children and rejects the possibility that vaping could be a smart step towards smoking cessation. Agencies like the American Lung Association add to the problem with their own fear mongering tactics. The World Health Organization has explicitly called ecigs a “threat” and the state of California has launched an all out war against public vaping.

With so much misinformation swirling from trusted sources, it’s really no surprise that smokers are hesitant to try switching to ecigs. Yet studies have shown that vaping is a much safer and healthier alternative to traditional cigarettes. If you look at how the UK is handling the ecig issue, you get a whole different perspective. Public Health England has publicly endorsed electronic cigarettes and is encouraging doctors to recommend vaping to their patients that smoke. Officials are even considering making ecigs available for free through the NHS.

Ultimately, American health groups have made some huge mistakes in the way they are handing ecigarettes. If they would take a similar approach to smoking cessation as they take to heroin use, it could result in millions of lives saved. Are ecigs harmless? Probably not completely. But you could also argue than methadone is quite dangerous, but it is still routinely promoted as the answer for heroin addiction.

Why do you think the CDC is so determined to attack electronic cigarettes? Do you think American health agencies are treating vapers unfairly?

Jimmy, lover, blogger, vaper and ex-smoker. I’ve been blogging about and supporting Vaping since 2009. They changed my life and I think history will show them as one of the most significant public health invention of the 21st century.

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Paul says:

    The issue is very simple. Methadone replacement leaves Public Health in charge. It is Public Health who are doling out the treatment, controlling the resources.

    Vaping is a free market solution. Public Health is not in charge, public health are not controlling the treatment or resources.

    In first instance, public health remain firmly in control. In second they have no control. All the scaremongering is simply public health trying to regain control in the only way they know how – by exaggerating risk they call for their own intervention.

  2. Richard says:

    Because it’s not taxed…Methadone is through big pharma and also the CDC is funded though Big Pharma…how can the CDC approve the use of something where BIG pharma can’t make money from…they sleep together…public health isn’t the CDC’s main goal…it is, only if there is money to be made…this has been known for a long time.

  3. Rob says:

    I believe both paul and richard are in part correct. But not enough. Also must include big tobacco and the corrupt politicians and corrupted “health” organizations. They are all losing money. So they would rather folks smoke cigs get sick and die. I personally believe investigations of corruption should be held against the highest levels. Last i looked bribery is still illegal. And thats exactly what big pharma and big tobacco are doing. Bribing or coercing their way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *